New York State students are being given too many tests, which leads to an improper evaluation of students, teachers and principals.
by Cecil Harris
New York State students are being given too many tests in a process that does not lead to a proper evaluation of students, teachers or principals, argued Sean Feeney, Ph.D., in the annual at on October 30.
In his lecture, 鈥淎ccountability in the Age of Pearson: Advocating for What Works in Schools,鈥 Dr. Feeney, principal of in Old Westbury, New York, said the frequency of overlong tests has increased dramatically since the State passed an Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) law in 2010, requiring the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers and principals.
鈥淪ince APPR, we have become test crazy,鈥 read one slide in Dr. Feeney鈥檚 presentation at the University鈥檚 .
Dr. Feeney cited statistics showing a rise in the total minutes of testing in English language arts and math for grades 3鈥8 in New York from 2008鈥2013: grade 3 testing went from 160 minutes to 420, an increase of 163 percent; grade 4 testing increased by 47 percent; grade 5 by 227 percent; grade 6 by 112 percent; grade 7 by 184 percent; and grade 8 by 69 percent.
The issue of excessive testing is hardly limited to New York, as Dr. Feeney made clear during the lecture sponsored by the .
One amusing slide of an editorial cartoon from The Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Mississippi, showed a student asking his teacher, 鈥淚s this the test to test us for the test to see if we are ready for the test?鈥
The results from all this testing, Dr. Feeney asserted, are reduced academic scores; students labeled as failures being forced out of classes; ineffective evaluation of teachers and principals, which threatens their employment status; and increased costs to school districts as tax money is redirected to testing companies for correction and analysis of exams.
鈥淲e have moved so far away from what we should be doing,鈥 Dr. Feeney said. 鈥淎s a society, I would love to see all the money being spent on faux education reforms go to areas of great need, such as addressing poverty, low expectations and other societal problems in certain communities.鈥
Dr. Feeney said the frequency of tests and the test results are being used to help the education company Pearson fulfill the terms of its $32 million contract with New York State. Dr. Feeney is one of eight principals to sign a letter to , expressing criticism of the APPR law. However, Dr. King dismissed the principals鈥 concerns, he said.
Offering solutions to the problem, Dr. Feeney cited measures that have been successfully implemented in other parts of the country. In Montgomery County, Maryland, for instance, those deemed master teachers serve as mentors for struggling teachers. As for improving students鈥 academic performance, Dr. Feeney advocated less testing and more teaching and nurturing.
For further information, please contact:
Todd Wilson
Strategic Communications Director听
p 鈥 516.237.8634
e 鈥 twilson@adelphi.edu